Bibliographie

TippHinweis: Urheberrecht

Wir bemühen uns, frei zugängliche Literatur zu verwenden. Sollte dies nicht möglich sein, bitten wir Sie, die Literatur über die Bibliotheksplattform LIBER Libraries zu beziehen. Von der Verwendung von Plattformen wie Anna’s Archive oder Library Genesis raten wir trotz stichhaltiger Argumente ab.

Siehe Karaganis (2018)

Bender, Emily M., Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, und Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. „On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜“. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21) (New York, NY, USA), März 1, 610–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.

Bundesgesetz über den Datenschutz (DSG) (2020). https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2022/491/de.

Buolamwini, Joy. 2023. Unmasking AI: A Story of Hope and Justice in a World of Machines. First edition. Random House.

Buolamwini, Joy, und Timnit Gebru. 2018. „Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification“. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, Bd. 81 (Januar): 77–91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html.

Campbell, Chris. 2025. „The Historian in the Age of AI“. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Online-Vorab-Publikation, Dezember 10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440125100509.

Carroll, Stephanie Russo, Ibrahim Garba, Oscar L. Figueroa-Rodríguez, u. a. 2020. „The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance“. Data Science Journal 19 (1): 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043.

Chen, Zhisheng. 2023. „Ethics and Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Recruitment Practices“. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x.

D’Ignazio, Catherine. 2024. Counting Feminicide: Data Feminism in Action. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14671.001.0001.

D’Ignazio, Catherine, und Lauren F. Klein. 2023. Data Feminism. First MIT Press paperback edition. The MIT Press. https://data-feminism.mitpress.mit.edu/.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. 2023. Stellungnahme des Präsidiums der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) zum Einfluss generativer Modelle für die Text- und Bilderstellung auf die Wissenschaften und das Förderhandeln der DFG. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. https://www.dfg.de/resource/blob/289674/ff57cf46c5ca109cb18533b21fba49bd/230921-stellungnahme-praesidium-ki-ai-data.pdf.

Díez García, Lucía, Paula Terleira Fernández, Valentín Cardeñoso-Payo, André F. Sales Mendes, und Álvaro Lozano Murciego. 2025. „Evaluating Vision Language Models for Handwritten Text Recognition“. In New Trends in Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99474-6_24.

Drage, Eleanor, und Kerry Mackereth. 2022. „Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI’s ‚Eradication of Difference‘“. Philosophy & Technology 35 (4): 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00543-1.

Drucker, Johanna. 2011. „Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display“. Digital Humanities Quarterly 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.63744/r4ysrh7ae534.

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2026. Living Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research: ERA Forum Stakeholders’ Document. Third version. European Commission. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/2b6cf7e5-36ac-41cb-aab5-0d32050143dc_en?filename=ec_rtd_ai-guidelines.pdf.

European Data Protection Board. 2026. Guidelines 1/2026 on Processing of Personal Data for Scientific Research Purposes. Version 1.0. European Data Protection Board. https://www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/documents/public-consultations/2026/guidelines-12026-processing-personal-data_en.

Fickers, Andreas. 2020. „Update für die Hermeneutik. Geschichtswissenschaft auf dem Weg zur digitalen Forensik?“ Zeithistorische Forschungen / Studies in Contemporary History 17 (1): 157–68. https://doi.org/10.14765/zzf.dok-1765.

Fickers, Andreas, und Juliane Tatarinov. 2022. „Digital Source Criticism: The Case of the Historian’s Craft in the Digital Age“. Journal of Digital History 2 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdh-2022-0001.

Historisches Institut, Universität Bern. 2026. „Richtlinien zur Verwendung von KI-gestützten Programmen“. Historisches Institut, Universität Bern, August 14. https://www.hist.unibe.ch/studium/plagiate__ki_gebrauch/index_ger.html.

Hodel, Tobias, David Schoch, Christa Schneider, und Jake Purcell. 2021. „General Models for Handwritten Text Recognition: Feasibility and State-of-the Art. German Kurrent as an Example“. Journal of Open Humanities Data 7 (Juli): 13. https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.46.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2026. „Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals“. Version Updated January 2026. Januar 1. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.

Kapoor, Sayash, Benedikt Stroebl, Zachary S. Siegel, Nitya Nadgir, und Arvind Narayanan. 2024. „AI Agents That Matter“. Juli 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.01502.

Karaganis, Joe, Hrsg. 2018. Shadow Libraries: Access to Knowledge in Global Higher Education. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11339.001.0001.

Karpathy, Andrej. 2025. Deep Dive into LLMs like ChatGPT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xTGNNLPyMI.

Lang, Sarah, und Elena Suárez Cronauer. 2026. „Beyond Data Feminism. Towards Ethical Data Work in the (Digital) Humanities“. Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften – Working Papers, Nr. 4 (Februar). https://doi.org/10.17175/wp_2026.

Lewis, Patrick, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, u. a. 2020. „Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks“. Mai 22. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401.

Luccioni, Alexandra Sasha, Christopher Akiki, Margaret Mitchell, und Yacine Jernite. 2023. „Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models“. November 9. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11408.

Luccioni, Sasha, Yacine Jernite, und Emma Strubell. 2024. „Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?“ Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’24) (New York, NY, USA), Juni 3, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658542.

Mattu, Surya, Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, und Lauren Kirchner. 2016. „Machine Bias“. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.

Meadows, R. Darrell, und Joshua Sternfeld. 2023. „Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of History“. The American Historical Review 128 (3): 1345–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhad362.

Mehrabi, Ninareh, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, und Aram Galstyan. 2021. „A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning“. ACM Computing Surveys 54 (6): 115:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607.

Milligan, Ian. 2019. History in the Age of Abundance? How the Web Is Transforming Historical Research. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvggx2kh.

Mueller, Milton L. 2025. „It’s Just Distributed Computing: Rethinking AI Governance“. Telecommunications Policy, Februar, 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102917.

Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.

O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.

Oberbichler, Sarah, und Cindarella Petz. 2025. Working Paper: Implementing Generative AI in the Historical Studies. Version 1.0. Februar 25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14924737.

Offert, Fabian, und Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal. 2024. „The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeutic“. Dezember 10. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.18833.

Ouyang, Long u. a. 2022. „Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback“. März 4. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.02155.

Penedo, Guilherme u. a. 2024. „The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale“. Oktober 31. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.17557.

Putnam, Lara. 2016. „The Transnational and the Text-Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows They Cast“. The American Historical Review 121 (2): 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/121.2.377.

Risam, Roopika, und Alex Gil. 2022. „Introduction: The Questions of Minimal Computing“. Digital Humanities Quarterly 16 (2). https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/16/2/000646/000646.html.

Romein, Christel Annemieke, Achim Rabus, Gundram Leifert, und Phillip Benjamin Ströbel. 2025. „Assessing Advanced Handwritten Text Recognition Engines for Digitizing Historical Documents“. International Journal of Digital Humanities 7 (1): 115–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-025-00100-0.

Russell, Stuart J., und Peter Norvig. 2020. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4. Aufl. Pearson.

Spirling, Arthur. 2023. „Why Open-Source Generative AI Models Are an Ethical Way Forward for Science“. Nature 616 (7957): 413. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01295-4.

Stark, Luke. 2023. „Artificial intelligence and the conjectural sciences“. BJHS Themes 8 (August): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/bjt.2023.3.

Sternfeld, Joshua. 2023. „AI-as-Historian“. The American Historical Review 128 (3): 1372–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhad368.

Strien, Daniel van, Kaspar Beelen, Mariona Coll Ardanuy, Kasra Hosseini, Barbara McGillivray, und Giovanni Colavizza. 2020. „Assessing the Impact of OCR Quality on Downstream NLP Tasks“. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2020) (Setúbal), Februar 22, 484–96. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009169004840496.

The Turing Way Community. 2022. „The Turing Way: A Handbook for Reproducible, Ethical and Collaborative Research“. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3233853.

The University of Chicago Press Editorial Staff. 2024. The Chicago Manual of Style. 18. Aufl. The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo213648716.html.

Turpin, Miles, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, und Samuel R. Bowman. 2023. „Language Models Don’t Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting“. Mai 7. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.04388.

Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 zum Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten (Datenschutz-Grundverordnung), Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union 1 (2016). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/deu.

Verordnung (EU) 2024/1689 zur Festlegung harmonisierter Vorschriften für künstliche Intelligenz (Verordnung über künstliche Intelligenz), Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union (2024). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/deu.

Walters, William H., und Esther Isabelle Wilder. 2023. „Fabrication and Errors in the Bibliographic Citations Generated by ChatGPT“. Scientific Reports 13 (1): 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5.

Wei, Jason, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, u. a. 2022. „Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models“. Januar 28. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903.

Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, u. a. 2016. „The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship“. Scientific Data 3: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2017. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/shoshana-zuboff/the-age-of-surveillance-capitalism/9781610395694/.

Hinweis

Diese Seite listet alle Referenzen auf, die im Projekt Critical AI Literacy für Historiker:innen zitiert werden. Die Bibliographie wird automatisch aus allen Zitaten generiert, die in den Übungen und der Dokumentation verwendet werden.